You can buy a stripped lower, and upper kit for around $600 -$700. I've seen Superior strippedl lowers for 80.00 give or take 10.00. You can get an A2 upper kit for around 460.00.
+1. I'm a cheap SOB but I'd like to get an EBR before the dems get a chance to remove that right. This is my planned route.BBunin said:Del Ton has a full kit for $450, ISTR. All you need to add to that is the Stripped Lower at around $100.
Oh, we'll still have the right. We'll have it every bit as much as we did over 200 years ago.beardman2 said:+1. I'm a cheap SOB but I'd like to get an EBR before the dems get a chance to remove that right. This is my planned route.
Not true. Most ARs are not 100% mil-spec. Bushmaster comes closest of those that sell to civvies.hikeeba said:Olympic makes mil-spec stuff just like everyone else,
After looking at the options of building one vs buying one, I finally decided to find the best deal I could on a complete rifle from Bushmaster. YMMV.Brickboy240 said:Its tempting to just buy the DPMS rifle rather than chance these budget receivers and parts kits made by small companies.
Same here. I just ordered my spike's tactical lower (I think it's made by the same place that makes the ones for STAG). Gonna order my Del-Ton kit before the end of the school year hopefully.BBunin said:Del Ton has a full kit for $450, ISTR. All you need to add to that is the Stripped Lower at around $100.
I love my RRA but I have to agree, from what I've heard, that Stag is a great bargain.Corey G said:Wow never seen this question before must be close to friday.
Stag Arms best bang for the buck.
Yeah Rollerman, I see what you are saying. I didn't mean to emulate Senator Kerry. Eeesh! I meant that I haven't heard or read people say OA products were bad, but rather when making a comparison people instead state that Bushy, DPMS, Stag, (insert other popular brand here) are just 'better' but don't really state why. I was more or less referring to my observation that certain brands seem to be very 'popular' and are therefore 'better.'Rollerman said:I've never read that Olympic Arms were 'worse' than other brands, just that other brands were 'better.'
Thats straight from the John Kerry handbook. He said, "I was for it before I was aganst it". If the others are better, (and I don't know if that's true) then the Olympic Arms must, by definition and logic, be worse. Hello!!