AR15 Forums banner

Heavy lubrication shown to improve M16, M4 effectiveness

1699 Views 10 Replies 0 Participants Last post by  hikeeba
G
http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2007/07/army_carbine_lubrication_070716/

Heavy lubrication shown to improve M16, M4 effectiveness

By Matthew Cox - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Jul 16, 2007 17:34:05 EDT

Army weapons officials might have found a way to improve the M16 family’s performance in the desert.

“Dust chamber” tests at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., last year show that M16 rifles and M4 carbines perform dramatically better when the weapon’s bolt assembly is heavily lubricated.

During each phase of the two-part “system assessment” at Army Test and Evaluation Command, testers fired 60,000 rounds through 10 weapon samples of each model.

Treated with light lubrication, new M16A4s and M4s, performed poorly in the extreme dust and sand conditions of the test, according to a January report from ATEC.

But when testers applied a heavy coat of lubrication to the weapons, the test results showed a “significant improvement.”

Out of the 60,000 rounds fired in each phase, the M4 stoppage-rate dropped from 9,836 with light lubrication to 678 with heavy lubrication.

The M16A4 stoppage-rate dropped from 2,124 with light lubrication to 507 with heavy lubrication, results show.

For years, Army weapons officials have preached to soldiers to virtues of applying a light coat of lubrication during weapons maintenance.

But the test results reinforce a recent change in weapons maintenance guidance Army units are practicing in Iraq and Afghanistan, said Col. Carl Lipsit, project manager for Soldier Weapons.

At the request of Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., the Army will conduct a similar dust-chamber test in August, pitting the M4 against the Heckler and Koch 416, the H&K XM8 and FNH USA’s Special Operations Forces Combat Assault Rifle.

All of the participating weapons will be treated with a heavy coat of lubrication during the test, Lipsit said.
See less See more
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
G
Nothing new here. ARs like to run wet.

Real talk from soldiers in the field. http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=6387
G
Nothing new here. ARs like to run wet.
True.
G
Wow.... guns work better when you lube them.... who knew?

I did. I have always used a blend of FP-10 and slide glide grease (of varying viscosities) liberally throughout and my guns show nearly zero wear.
G
This was shown to me years ago by a shooter that had been shooting AR's for a long time. When my AR gets all nasty from extended shooting, and the accumulation of dust/dirt/sand gets built up, I just squirt oil into the hole in the side of the carrier that is a direct path to the pistol. After that, it will run good for quite a while. Another squirt and off we go again.

Basically he put it like this, the bolt inside the carrier is like a piston inside a cylinder. Would you want that piston going up and down that cylinder without lubrication?
G
Yeah, but this goes against some of the AR15.com posts claiming too much lube is bad!
G
Yeah, but this goes against some of the AR15.com posts claiming too much lube is bad!
Hehe..yeah.

M4carbine.net is basically troll free. I haven't been to ARFCOM in well over a month.
G
why would the army tell me to use 1 or 2 drops then?
if more wet is better
G
I use a some mobile 1 synthetic on my rifle. And it runs like a well oiled machine (no pun) One thing I notics after rapid fire, It don't seem as hot as with say CLP
G
why would the army tell me to use 1 or 2 drops then?
if more wet is better
Probably a logistics thing. I would imagine the US Army uses a fair bit of lube (insert Navy joke here) as it is. I use easily 10 to 15 times as much as they tell you to... 1 or 2 drops will work, so why use 10 times as much for a potentially small gain in reliability?
G
I use a some mobile 1 synthetic on my rifle. And it runs like a well oiled machine (no pun) One thing I notics after rapid fire, It don't seem as hot as with say CLP
Really? Hmm. What viscocity do you use? I may opt to try that. I would imagine a quart would go a long, long ways, too. Very interesting.
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top